... and again with the attachments: Am 01.05.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Urs Liska: > Could you post an image of how it looks with your LilyPond version so we > know that we are talking about the same stuff? > Attached is the output of 2.19.20, and I must say I don't have any > objections against the spacing.
My output (2.19.16) looks exactly the same as yours. The original score has more horizontal beams (as in the attachment) and then the visual impression (at least mine) is guided by the stem spacing. If I connect all beams via [ ] then the optical spacing is applied over the whole beam group (=measure) (second example in the attachment). In a printed score (Boosey & Hawkes), all four beams follow one line with a very slight slope and the stems are spaced equally (as in my second example but with gaps between the beamed groups). Cheers, Joram
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
