Hi Ming, > On Apr 23, 2015, at 7:41 AM, MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> wrote: > > Good morning Paul, > > Thank you very much for you jianpu4.ly. > > I run your jianpu-test.ly and sportted one note not the same in key C and key > D. The 2nd note on third measure - a dot below the horizontal bar is missing > in key D.
Good catch. I see now that the octave dots in Jianpu are not based on the absolute octave of the note but are relative to the current key / key signature. In other words, the Jianpu octave increases between 7 and 1, and not between b and c. Attached is a new version jianpu5.ly that gets the octave dots right. Let me know if you see anything else that’s not correct. I have also changed the name of the custom staff context to JianpuStaff to match the other staff contexts in LilyPond. (Although I have a slight preference for having it the other way around, consistency is good.) Thanks for your appreciation! -Paul
jianpu5.ly
Description: Binary data
jianpu-octaves-test.ly
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
