Hi Mats, > No, that's asking for trouble! The code should primarily reflect the musical > interpretation, not just the notation. In know that it works to do as you > propose in many examples, but it clearly does not work if you use > \unfoldRepeats (in MIDI), for example.
Can \repeat not be defined so that — possibly with parameters/switches — it will Do The Right Thing™ in all engraved (e.g., PDF), expressed (e.g., MIDI), and other (e.g., MusicXML) output streams without requiring poor or inefficient structural coding? Thanks, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
