Hello Ming,
here’s the best I could come up with. I remember that in hand-engraved
scores, this is resolved by shifting the two notes further apart and
placing the dots close to each one, which I now mimicked, albeit very
poorly: the dot placement looks very odd now. Perhaps you’ll want to
fiddle with extra-offset more, adjusting also the Y value (which I
didn’t; you may also make the music function take it as another argument
– see the Extending Manual on explanations), so it will look good.
HTH, Simon
Am 26.03.2015 um 16:26 schrieb MING TSANG:
Adnrew,
Sorry, I choose the wrong word here.
I was hoping that the dot will be displayed closer to the notehead.
e.g. 1st bar of bass staff, the dot of quarter note be displayed
closer to quarter note , now it line up with the half note. This is
more evident on bar3.
Immanuel,
Ming
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 9:13 AM, Andrew Bernard
<andrew.bern...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am not convinced the dots look awful. It’s perfectly legible to me -
just highly dotted notation. What do you mean by awful, exactly?
Andrew
On 26 March 2015 at 10:29:06, MING TSANG (tsan...@rogers.com
<mailto:tsan...@rogers.com>) wrote:
Lilyponders:
how to solve the dots after notehead and tie collides.
1. tie collide with notehead -- treble staff sample
2. place of dots look awful and not clear - refer to bass staff
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
