Reading your question again, I realize that I was maybe too patronizing in my answer. If you process the file with lilypond-bin without any extra flags, you will get a file that can be processed by LaTeX. However, I'm not sure why you would want such a file. If you want to include it in another LaTeX document, you should definitely take a look at the program lilypond-book, which lets you include music scores within a LaTeX document, either with inline LilyPond code or by refering to a separate file.
Thanks for the tip, Mats. My problem now is that I use pdflatex and LilyPond uses "pure" latex. The command "lilypond" recognizes a --pdftex flag, but "lilypond-book" doesn't. Is there a way to use pdflatex instead of "pure" latex? This is the error I get (after running lilypond-book and typesetting the modified latex source with pdflatex):
--
[23] (./lily-1018341799.tex
(/Users/etl/Library/texmf/tex/latex/lilypond/lilyponddefs.tex
(/Users/etl/Library/texmf/tex/latex/lilypond/feta20.tex)
(/Users/etl/Library/texmf/tex/latex/lilypond/lily-pdf-defs.tex)
\outputscale=\dimen121
\scoreshift=\dimen122
)
! Undefined control sequence.
<argument> ...n 76.6020 \outputscale \embeddedps
{ 0.0650 0.0650 2.5000 0.8...
l.168 }
%
? h
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
--
I suppose the problem is the "\embeddedps" command. pdflatex doesn't know about it. Am I correct?
Cheers, Ernesto. -- Ernesto Trajano de Lima <http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~etl> ============================ "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
_______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
