José Luis Cruz wrote:

A 16/02/04 12:01:01
David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:



That's fine, but I don't see any problem with "Jazz 8ths".  You seem
to have the impression that jazz-swing 8ths are 2:1 triplets.  They
aren't even close.  I thought for some time that they were 3:2
quintuplets, but when I got to actually try ratios on the computer I
found that they are more like 17:15 or 33:31.  You need to consult
someone who has tested what the limits are, because I haven't, but a
triplet is a triplet for sure, not a jazz-swing 8th.




Simplifying it, i could say:



If you play normal 8ths... that's not jazzy


If you play triplets (4th 8th) / (2:1)... thats another thing, but
isn't jazz at all.


But if you try playing triplets (4th 8th) / (2:1) with the accent in the last beat (and at reasonable speed), then you're closer to what is jazz-swing. It's something between the last two, yep.



I agree with your interpretations of how to play it but a common notation at least in wind band music to indicate swing as ( eighth eighth = \times 2/3 { quarter eighth } ). I presume you know what I mean since it would have taken me much longer to write the way it is seen.

Paul Scott


_______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to