This is a typical case where Lilypond functions would come as
a useful addition to variables. The text would be a parameter,
in something such as:
MySeq(x) = \notes {a^\x b c d a a}
Perhaps the right way of dealing with this would be to handle
them as symbolic macros rather than true functions.
Besides, if we ever need recursion, we can always revert to
Scheme :-)
Is this so bizarre that I'm the only Lilypond user who thinks
this might prove useful ?
Cheers,
Darius/
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hello.
>
> Is there a way to add text to a staff, other than making it superscript or
> subscript
> of a note?
> The point is that I have a sequence of notes that is recurring, so that I use
> a variable
> to store them, but I want to add a different text to (the begininning or end
> of) that
> sequence each time it appears, hence I can't add the text inside the variable
> definition.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gilles
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lilypond-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
