On 2004/01/30, J. Daniel Ashton wrote:
>Still, my gut says that there should be individual glyphs for these >common markings, to make them as perfect as our noteheads and stems, >sharps, flats, etc. I disagree with this idea. If only a few of the most common word-like markings get separate glyphs, then all other such markings will look out-of-place. If it's possible to create/modify a font in order to improve ALL possible word-like markings, that would make sense. Otherwise better left as is. David _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
