[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > A first step to improve the usability of the "programmer reference" > (which in my opinion is a misnomer)
It's called program reference; suggestions for better names appreciated. > would be to give more explicit > explanations of the possible values for each property. > One problem is that the set of possible values may be different for the > same property depending on what kind of object you set it on, but in > most cases that's not a problem. We can solve that partly, by having different doc-strings per interface, by adding ("generic string" (text-item-interface . "specific doc string") (rest-interface . "specific doc string") ) but I think that a first improvement would be to simply add the information to the interface doc-strings. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user