On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-15] José Luis Cruz wrote:

> 
> So i really don't know it has changed anything respect from previous
> versions. I attach the lilypond conversion of example9.not, if someone
> is intereseted could take a look at it.
> 

Could please anybody formulate a simple rule what has changed ? Is the
following true:

        Inside chords <  > nothing else may appear then pitch names.

        All other things ("!", "\arpeggio", "-.", "-^", "--", "->", "\fermata",
                "\trill", "\prall", "\spanrequest ...",
                "\cr", "\rced", "\segno", ...)
        must appear after the closing '>' sign ?


> I've just compiled it, in my sid, and i've found several errors of
> sound-coordination when playing some of the examples that comes with
> it, -the ones which have several staves-. 

This has to do with your system performance especially if you use
a softwre MIDI synthesizer like TiMidity, FluidSynth ...

> Apart from that, the
> lilypond code that it produces doesn't compile with 2.1.6 -at first
> sight-, and neither says anywhere which version is but...

It should output:

 LilyPond check: found version: 2.1.6
 WITHOUT semicolons.
 WITH wavelines (for trills)
 WITH slures in graces
 NOTE LENGTHs after chords

If not: Is the lilypond command in your PATH ?
> 
> chords are made this way: < g b > for example,

.... and this is wrong ?

-- 
J.Anders, Chemnitz, GERMANY ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to