On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-15] José Luis Cruz wrote: > > So i really don't know it has changed anything respect from previous > versions. I attach the lilypond conversion of example9.not, if someone > is intereseted could take a look at it. >
Could please anybody formulate a simple rule what has changed ? Is the following true: Inside chords < > nothing else may appear then pitch names. All other things ("!", "\arpeggio", "-.", "-^", "--", "->", "\fermata", "\trill", "\prall", "\spanrequest ...", "\cr", "\rced", "\segno", ...) must appear after the closing '>' sign ? > I've just compiled it, in my sid, and i've found several errors of > sound-coordination when playing some of the examples that comes with > it, -the ones which have several staves-. This has to do with your system performance especially if you use a softwre MIDI synthesizer like TiMidity, FluidSynth ... > Apart from that, the > lilypond code that it produces doesn't compile with 2.1.6 -at first > sight-, and neither says anywhere which version is but... It should output: LilyPond check: found version: 2.1.6 WITHOUT semicolons. WITH wavelines (for trills) WITH slures in graces NOTE LENGTHs after chords If not: Is the lilypond command in your PATH ? > > chords are made this way: < g b > for example, .... and this is wrong ? -- J.Anders, Chemnitz, GERMANY ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user