Chip Zoller writes: > The problem with criticisms such as this one don't take into > consideration that everything with Finale and more is fully > customizeable.
The argument is mostly about automated engraving. Customizability does not score points. We had discussions on this before, please look in the archives. > Finale is used by some of the world's largest publication houses > (even Barenreiter) > and I don't think they would all be using it if a better approach to > engraving existed. You have contacts with Baerenreiter, that's very interesting! I understand that publishing houses never talk about the software they use. You would not happen to know the last time Baerenreiter tested and dismissed LilyPond? We're always interested in hearing about problems they might have. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
