[I have the impression that something is messed up at gnu.org - I'm not sure if this got through, so a repost.]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Related question: Why did you change the requirements from 1.6.0 to > 1.6.4? I tried compiling Lily 1.8 against Guile 1.6.0 (fooling the > configure script) since I had the same problem as Jan to find 1.6.4. > As far as I could see, the program worked fine, but maybe my tests > didn't exercise exactly the missing features. > > (In the end, I found the tar file for 1.6.4 at one of the Gnu mirror > sites, so now I have upgraded as well.) Werner Lemberg reported that GUILE 1.6.0 was missing the srfi string library, and upgrading to 1.6.4 worked for him. (In other words: Although It Works For Me, I Just Listen To Users.) The problem with finding the 1.6.4 tar file is unfortunate: a break-in was discovered at gnu.org, so now the FTP archive as has to be rebuilt. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
