(BTW, If noone objects, I propose to move this discussion to lilypond-devel)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > 1. Needs a logo. Doesn't need to be anything fancy, but we need > > > something that can serve as a graphical identifier. > > > > We still have the old logo (which is also under switch/ ) > > You mean cello lady? I'm thinking along the lines, of, say, the PHP > logo. In other words, the word Lilypond in an ellipse or something. Just > something nice and clean to put at the top of a page. Also appropriate > for other sites to use as a link button, etc. ok. Maybe "LilyPond" with a stylized waterlily on top or below. Or the cello lady could be stylized. > That's not quite what I mean. I'm thinking more along the lines of the > areas at the top and bottom of the page (header/nav links and footer) > being a different color than the content area. That yellow would work. > The idea is to make the various parts of the page obviously deliniated, > the same purpose the horizontal rules play now, but more obvious. Of course, good idea. > This seems rather like putting the cart before the horse to me. When a > website visitor sees a navigation menu, they expect ALL important (and > even not so important) parts of the site to listed. Good point. How's this? (just added a simple documentation entry). > Personally, I think > the large image, while pretty, is very counter productive. With a > browser maximised on my Gnome desktop, Quick Links actually ends up > BELOW the scroll, which makes it very easy to miss. Hmm. A question of layout? the space left & right of the image are unused. Maybe if we put it somewhere else? (I think every page should have a picture to make it more attractive) I'm running at 1600x1200, I suppose that I'm a little spoiled. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
