[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > have a different definition for each value. Of course I can > do that now, but I'd rather do it in lilypond. Is it particularly > impossible to adopt or adapt the LaTeX \newcommand to make > that possible? With that you can pass multiple parameters to a > command (or combination of commands?)
It is absolutely out of the question. I am not, NEVER going to add macros to lilypond. They make a complete mess of a nice language, and if you don't believe me, go read LaTeX definition files, or try to make heads and tails of what's written in chapter 20 of the TeX book. I mean, if Donald Knuth manages to make a macro language into something unintelligible, how do you suppose that a mere mortal like me is ever going to make something clean out of it? This decision is final. If you want parametrisation, learn Scheme. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
