[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Another aspect of the documentation: Do we really need the > invented word 'grob'? Wouldn't 'object' work well in most > situations? It would clearly simplify for the average reader. > It could still be a useful concept in the source code but > for the documentation it'd be better to write out 'graphical > object' in full in the few situations where they could be > confused with non-graphical objects.
Point taken. Anyone for a big Search & Replace patch? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
