On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > clashes: Notes are handled nicely, and everything else (at least what I > > tried: fingerings, (phrasing)slurs, dynamics, pedaling and free text) is > > so that they look nice together with the notes. But these graphical > > objects don't know about the existence of each other. So slur, fingering > > and dynamic happening at the same time may clash wildly, simply because > > they are each positioned as if the others weren't there. Is that correct? > > Yes.
Phew, then I didn't miss out on anything big. Then as far as I can see I might as well use direct scheme immediately for textual dynamics, since I cannot expect to be able to pad them into place anyways. Another question: If I put stuff, for instance text, in separate voices using spacer notes, will positioning be the same? Or another way to put it; are other voices taken into account when resolving clashes? Another question#2: It's prob in the manual somewhere, but is there a dummy spacer that doesn't take up time? Using "s" breaks the barline checking. -- peace, love & harmony Atte _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user