I have used Finale and other Windows oriented
programs, like Notheworthy Composer. They are normally easier to learn.
Notherworthy is very simple and quick to use but it has limitations when getting
into the printing chapter.
I certainly prefer the graphic environment of
Windows to the command oriented environment of Linux. A couple of decades ago I
was happy to leave in Unix but that looks like another life to me. However, I
have found that Lilypond produces much nicer printer music that any of the
windows oriented programs, included Finale. Finale does not seem to be easy
either, I have only used in someone else computer for I do not have licencense
but it takes a lot to figure out how things are organized.
Lilypond looks more complicated initiatlly and it
is difficult to find how to do certain things (from the mere reading of the
manual). However, it produces much nicer printed music and I think it ends
actually being faster to type the music directly into a file. I can normally do
this without even looking to the screen, so I can keep my eyes into the score
and type as I read which it is more relaxing that tying to find out where that g
(sol) should go. I think Lilypond uses more "intelligent" and it is more
musical in its structure. For example, the uses of voices, or the input in
relative mode, etc, are things that approach the editing to the actual musical
content and that is nice.
The dissavantge for me it is the relatively long
time that it takes to rund under Windows in the cgwing environment but I am
happy paying the price, and looking to the time when I can get more expert and
be faster (and make less errors).
In summary, I am planning to use lilypond for
getting scores printed and maybe still use the Windows programs, for execersies
or in the future for Midi input.
I hope these thoughts are of help.
Carlos
|
- Re: Shape notes Sander, Martin
- Re: Shape notes Laura Conrad
- Re: Shape notes Sander, Martin
- Re: Shape notes Laura Conrad
- Re: Shape notes Sander, Martin
- (no subject) Rune Zedeler
- (no subject) Mammen John \( Bobby \)
- Re: (no subject) David Raleigh Arnold
- (no subject) richard tocce
- Re: (no subject) Glen Prideaux
- (no subject) Carlos Garcia Suarez
- (no subject) Hispa21
- (no subject) Agente Hispa21
- Re: (no subject) David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: (no subject) Jan Nieuwenhuizen
- (no subject) Steven Thompson
- Re: (no subject) Hans Forbrich
- Re: What to do now [formerly (no subject)... Hans Forbrich
- (no subject) sensorial soft music
- (no subject) Han-Wen Nienhuys
- (no subject) AndrewSBoit