> On 30 Jun 2025, at 19:33, Luca Fascione <l.fasci...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What's the purpose of this "caging"? Is it security against malicious code, > or more protection from non-malicious run-away processes? What's the thinking? In general, you don't run Turing-complete code without caging. The caging doesn't save you, say, from a denial of service caused by memory allocation, but it avoids the creation or deletions of files outside the cage. If you're comfortable without cage, don't use it. Ciao, seba
- Re: LSR in dismission Werner LEMBERG
- Re: LSR in dismission Sebastiano Vigna
- Re: LSR in dismission Werner LEMBERG
- Re: LSR in dismission Sebastiano Vigna
- Re: LSR in dismission Luca Fascione
- Re: LSR in dismission Werner LEMBERG
- Re: LSR in dismission Luca Fascione
- Re: LSR in dismission Sebastiano Vigna
- Re: LSR in dismission Luca Fascione
- Re: LSR in dismission Sebastiano Vigna
- Re: LSR in dismission Werner LEMBERG
- Re: LSR in dismission Carl Sorensen
- AI is not a solution Simon Albrecht
- Re: AI is not a solution Sebastiano Vigna
- Re: AI is not a solution Simon Albrecht
- Re: AI is not a solution Graham King
- Re: AI is not a solution Luca Fascione
- Re: AI is not a solution Luca Fascione
- Re: AI is not a solution Graham King
- Re: AI is not a solution David Kastrup