> On 30 Jun 2025, at 19:33, Luca Fascione <l.fasci...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> What's the purpose of this "caging"? Is it security against malicious code, 
> or more protection from non-malicious run-away processes? What's the thinking?

In general, you don't run Turing-complete code without caging. The caging 
doesn't save you, say, from a denial of service caused by memory allocation, 
but it avoids the creation or deletions of files outside the cage. If you're 
comfortable without cage, don't use it.

Ciao,

                                                         seba


Reply via email to