> > git shortlog -s --after="10 years ago" elisp > Not to say there haven't been commits, but the majority of substantial code hasn't been touched.
> git grep lilypond-ts-mode > > yields exactly zero hits in the LilyPond repository. > > Neither is there anything in either ELPA or MELPA to be found. > > If you want to solicit feedback, maybe you should put some info about it > anywhere where it could be found? And/or place the package in MELPA or > some other readily available Emacs package repository? > > Particularly putting the package in one of the standard package > repositories would make it simple for people to install, test, deinstall > and/or update the package. > For right now, installation is manual from the Github repository linked in my initial message. This is partly what I wanted to get opinions regarding. Obviously historically lilypond-mode has been shipped as a component of LilyPond itself, but it seems better going forward to use MELPA or eventually perhaps ELPA. If lilypond-ts-mode is to be considered official or quasi-official, is there any objection to me going ahead and submitting to MELPA myself? Saul
