Am Sa., 18. Jan. 2025 um 00:10 Uhr schrieb Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de>: > > Hi everyone! > > Looking at MR 2521 [1] again after 2544 has been merged, I wanted to try > using Werner’s glyph within Harm’s new side-articulation feature. So I > made the test code below (right now using "prall" glyph for test-testing > purposes). Why does Lily say > > “warning: do not know how to interpret articulation: bachschleifer” > > ? > > Best, Simon > > > [1] https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2521 > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > \version "2.25.23" > > %default-script-alist.bachschleifer = > #(set! default-script-alist > (assoc-set! default-script-alist 'bachschleifer > `((script-stencil . (feta . ("prall" . "prall"))) > (padding . 0.05) > (avoid-slur . around) > (side-axis . X) > (direction . ,LEFT)))) > bachschleifer = #(make-articulation 'bachschleifer) > > { > \key g \minor > \time 6/8 > > \partial 8 g'8 | > es''8.[\bachschleifer d''16 c''8] > as''8.[\bachschleifer g''16 f''8] % \break > des'''8.[\bachschleifer c'''16 bes''8] > fis''8.[\bachschleifer e''16 d''8] > } >
Look at input/regression/script-custom-definition.ly for a how-to (with already known script-glyphs). If you want to test !2521 you'll need to recompile, otherwise the bachschleifer-glyph will not be found. Be ensured it'll work, I checked while working on !2544 Cheers, Harm
