Am Sa., 17. Feb. 2024 um 18:47 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
<thomasmorle...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> please consider the following code:
>
> \version "2.25.13"
>
> \paper {
> print-first-page-number = ##t
> bookpart-level-page-numbering = ##t
> }
>
> \book {
> \bookpart { \markuplist \table-of-contents }
> \bookpart {
> \paper { page-number-type = #'roman-upper }
> \tocItem \markup "Text"
> \markup { Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. }
> }
> \bookpart {
> \tocItem \markup "Music"
> { b }
> }
> }
>
> Imho, there are two issues here
> a) the intern links of the toc are all not working correctly, more
> precisely, they all point to page 1 of the resulting pdf.
> b) I'd prefer if the toc would print the page-number as formated in
> the bookparts, i.e. for "Text" as roman capital.
>
> `bookpart-level-page-numbering' was implemented with
>
> commit 4e2ebc31eb79319c6914fe5e5c1836d5e873d3ee
> Author: Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr>
> Date: Tue Aug 9 10:23:37 2022 +0200
>
> Add bookpart-level-page-numbering paper variable
>
> If bookpart-level-page-numbering is set to #t, bookparts have
> independent sequences of page numbers. This can be useful if
> publishing a set of instrumental parts that are joint in a single
> book, perhaps with a common introduction, but intended to be used
> separately. Furthermore, setting this variable only for the first
> bookpart in conjunction with page-number-type can be used to number
> pages in the introductory material with separate numbering and in
> roman numbers, which is common practice.
>
> Fixes #6396
>
> If I understand correctly (and my cc-knowledge is more or less zero)
> the change in paper-book.cc overrides the real page-number, meaning
> \with-link only sees the new value.
> I found no workaround...
>
> How about implementing some logic like current-page-number vs
> internal-page-number like we have with currentBarNumber and
> internalBarNumber?
> The page-number in toc could then be printed as current-page-number
> but point to internal-page-number.
>
> Thanks,
> Harm
>
> P.S. I didn't write about formating the toc (the second point above),
> worth another thread...
I've created two issues:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6696
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6697
Cheers,
Harm
