Following up on this post from the user list:
At 11:24 on 10 Feb 2023, Knute Snortum wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:48 AM Mark Knoop <m...@opus11.net> wrote:
>> At 10:38 on 10 Feb 2023, Knute Snortum wrote:
>>> I have run into something in LilyPond that's annoying -- it probably
>>> doesn't rise to the level of bug. When you have two notes in
>>> different octaves but "on the same level" because of an ottava, the
>>> accidental is repeated. This makes sense logically because they are
>>> not the same note, but it doesn't look right to me, at least. Maybe
>>> it's the intended behavior?
>>
>> FWIW, Gould writes:
>>
>> "Repeat an accidental if sounding at a different octave, even when the
>> same pitch is used with an octave sign."
> Okay, so it sounds like it's a desired behavior. Thanks for looking
> that up for me.
... I noticed that this:
{ aes, \ottava #-1 a,, }
does *not* place a cautionary accidental on the second note. Perhaps is
should or could?
--
Mark Knoop
