On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 5:02 PM Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> wrote:
> > Well, blame my email program, as it truncated my original post. I had > intended to fully call out that ** is exponentiation in some language, > thus might not be the best symbol. > > But this discussion is quickly devolving into needless dissection of > details. If you object at the high-level, let us not waste time at the > low-level. > I don't object at the high level of reducing the verbosity of "\repeat unfold" . It is so cumbersome that I only use it if I have a longish musical phrase to repeat. My objection is that "**" is too close to "*" and could lead to more confusion. As I said earlier, if we can avoid the potential confusion, I can see it being a valuable construct. Thanks, Carl
