> You may want to look at whether > https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1076 can/should be updated now > that 2.24 supports some of the glyphs shown.
Hmm. The first five glyphs in the snippet are now part of the
Emmentaler font, but the next eight are not. Actually, I have never
seen such symbols, and the SmuFL standard doesn't have this either.
Where are they taken from? Does someone have evidence for the
existence of those glyphs?
Werner
