Le 02/01/2023 à 17:25, Amir Czwink a écrit :
But come on, you don't need to be experts to discover code duplication. Even if you're not familiar with Arabic music, the same blocks of code in a single file from a single contribution can possibly be spotted and it should be in your best interest to have as few copy-pasted code as possible. I mean the first contribution to hel-arabic.ly even redefined the "major" and "minor" key-signatures (and copies of that too) with exactly these names to the exact definition they already have. Ok, but as far as I understood it, people simply don't look at the content of contributions about music styles they are not familiar with. Well then, here I am to do it.
The distinction between "you" and "I" is artificial. Who are "you" and "people"? Why would "you" not include you? What about volunteering to review contributions to Gregorian music support? This is not ironic.
But I wonder, how the process will work then? Every one simply commits what he thinks is best and we regularly overwrite each others contributions? That can't be in the best interest of nobody...
No. Just look at open merge requests. But in a volunteer project, nobody is entitled to anything, so there is no absolute promise that every contribution will be reviewed. The only thing you can do is promising that _you_ will review things. Jean
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
