>> Please have a look at the attached image; it's taken from the LM,
>> chapter 3.1.4. As can be seen, `_` and `-` are bold, and `^`
>> isn't. Is it possible to make `_` and `-` bold only if used as
>> articulation (i.e., *after* `[_^-]`)?
>
> The relevant part of the output generated by lilypond-book for this
> snippet is
>
> @ifnothtml
> @pygments
> @tb{\relative}@t{ }@t{@{}@t{ }@t{c''}@t{4}@tb{_-}@tb{^1}@t{
> }@t{d}@tb{^.}@t{ }@t{f}@tb{^4}@tb{_2}@tb{->}@t{
> }@t{e}@tb{^-}@tb{_+}@t{ }@t{@}}
> @endPygments
> @end ifnothtml
>
>
> That looks correct, [...]
The above example was the wrong one, sorry. What I actually wanted to
show are inconsistencies. In the same section you can find
```
c''4-3 e-5 b-2 a-1
```
which Pygments translates to
```
@t{c''} @t{4} @t{-3} @t{e} @t{-5} @t{b} @t{-2} @t{a} @t{-1}
```
that is, the `-` is not typeset in bold. The next one
```
c''4-ˆ c-+ c-- c-!
```
gets translated to
```
@t{c''} @t{4} @tb{-^} @t{c} @tb{-+} @t{c} @t{--} @t{c} @tb{-!}
^^^^^^
```
showing bold and non-bold for `-` in the same function.
Werner
