Am Mi., 5. Jan. 2022 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr>: > > [Replying via the mailing list because it's unrelated to Werner's MR] > > Le 05/01/2022 12:59, Thomas Morley (@Thomas_Morley) > <git...@mg.gitlab.com> a écrit : > > [1]Thomas Morley commented on a discussion on > [2]Documentation/en/notation/notation-appendices.itely: > > Unrelated to this patch > Though, [3]@jeanas > > They do. You might be confused by the change of presentation > > Indeed, I was wrong. Alas, in IR the former behaviour added to every > interface: > > This grob interface is used in the following graphical object(s): > list-of-grobs > > Now > > This grob interface is added dynamically to grobs of class > Spanner/Item. > > is printed. > I miss this list-of-grobs in the docs now. > Any chance to get this back in the IR for item/spanner-interface or > have this list somewhere in IR linked from thoe interfaces? > > That is feasible if we define what it means to be "used": basically > should Footnote be included in this list or not since it will sometimes > have it and sometimes not? Should grobs having the interface > conditionally be in a separate list? The info on _allowable_ classes > (and thus interfaces) is all in define-grobs.scm, it's just a matter of > defining how it should be presented. > > Cheers, > > Jean > > References > > 1. https://gitlab.com/Thomas_Morley > 2. > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1095#note_801886836 > 3. https://gitlab.com/jeanas
IIuc, only 5 grobs may be item _or_ spanner: BalloonText ControlPoint ControlPolygon Footnote Parentheses All others are definitely Items or Spanners. If so, then I'd suggest to have three lists to link to in IR: Items, Spanners, Items-or-Spanners Cheers, Harm
