Am Donnerstag, dem 09.12.2021 um 06:32 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > On Wed, Dec 8 2021 at 21:25:47 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> > wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 01:43 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > > I know you want to build natively and you don't have an ARM64 > > > machine to build it. > > > Any chance you can use for example Github runners to build them? > > > > > > https://github.community/t/ask-about-github-hosted-runners-arm64-platform-support/167483 > > > > > > https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners/about-self-hosted-runners#supported-architectures-and-operating-systems-for-self-hosted-runners > > > > As discussed in that thread, there are no AArch64 runners available on > > GitHub, we'd have to provide them ourselves AFAICS. I'm not sure this > > makes sense... How do you provide AArch64 binaries right now? If this > > is an extension, I'd like to postpone this until we're actually on > > this new infrastructure. > > LilyPond is built from source on Flathub infrastructure. > If you click on the green check here: > https://github.com/flathub/org.frescobaldi.Frescobaldi/commits/master > > you'll see the recent builds. This is for aarch64: > https://flathub.org/builds/#/builders/51/builds/5253 > > Yes, it's not Github.
Ok, so it could stay like this, there's nothing that would be "broken" by not providing AArch64 binaries. Btw, is there a reason the Flatpak only bundles 2.22.0, not the latest 2.22.1? Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
