Kieren MacMillan <kie...@kierenmacmillan.info> writes: > Hi all, > > On Nov 14, 2021, at 9:00 AM, Kieren MacMillan <kie...@kierenmacmillan.info> > wrote: > > There just is no uniquely identified print form using a note in the > > denominator for that time signature representation. > > As I’ve explained several times, there is. > > Here’s a screenshot for anyone who can’t envision the uniquely identified > print form of 8/20 using a > note in the denominator: > *
How is that uniquely identified? Why couldn't it be subscripted with 10 instead of 5? -- David Kastrup
