Hi David, > Are you sure you mean triplet eights? I’ve played a piece by Adés with a 2/6 > time signature in places and the note I would expect in the denominator would > be a quarter note with a triplet bracket as the notes printed as quarters > were the same value as quarter note triplets due to them being a sixth of a > while note.
Yes, my error: tuplet quarters is correct. Thanks for the correction! Fortunately, my logic of the way in which a note-denom glyph corresponds *uniquely* to the correct note value isn’t ruined by that slip on my part in that specific case. =) Cheers, Kieren.
