John Wheeler <[email protected]> writes: > Hello, > > Would someone please help me understand the reasoning behind removing > the grammar from the Contributor's Guide? Was there a licensing > issue?
It was more of a matter of it having become comparatively uninformative due to lots of LilyPond functionality getting moved into music functions, and music function parsing governed to a significant degree by actions generating synthetic tokens in addition to rules of the grammar, making large parts of the printed grammar (which only reflects the rules) comparatively unsuitables for figuring out what music constructs may or may not end up being valid. So it was more of a point of "nobody uses this anyway" in connection with "and good luck if they tried" I think. -- David Kastrup
