Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> writes: > Le 25/09/2021 à 14:44, David Kastrup a écrit : >> Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> writes: >>> Still, be pedantic and miss the forest for the trees, my point was >>> that \x is a good option if \* was going to be problematic. >> Sure, but the problem with \× is exactly that × is not part of ASCII and >> thus does not uniformly work on extended ASCII encodings (of which the >> non-8-bit UTF-8 encoding that LilyPond uses for representing code points >> in the Latin-1 specific subrange of Unicode is only one). > > You did realize that Aaron talked about the good option being \x and not \×?
You did realize that Aaron previously to \x declared \× to be an option, stating that code point D7 was part of ASCII, then insisted that the ASCII standard magically switched to becoming 8 bit at some point of time? -- David Kastrup
