>> * About the rotated wiggle glyphs in Bravura: Do you have any idea
>> why this is so? If not, can you please ask the SMuFL people? It
>> looks definitely wrong to me! They should either correct the
>> font or provide glyph name aliases for horizontal typesetting
>> (assuming that glyph names, once introduced, can't be changed any
>> longer). [...]
>
> I don't know... the SMuFL specs don't seem to say anything about it.
> I'll message their list when I get the time.
Thanks in advance!
>> * In your table I don't see a Bravura glyph
>> `ornamentZigZagLineShortened`. Is it really shortened that much
>> so that you no longer can see it? :-)
>
> Nope! `ornamentZigZagLineShortened` is a name I thought up in lieu
> of a SMuFL equivalent. It's a limitation of my coloring system that
> all contentious mappings, whether suggested new glyphs or existing
> bravura glyphs, show up the same red color.
Ah, ok.
> Anyone object to calling it `ornamentZigZagLineAlt` until further
> notice?
This is fine with me.
Werner
