>> A quick work-around is to use Guile 2.x, as Jean has reported in >> !808... > > Is that actually better? Last time I had contact with Guile-2.x in > that respect, it replaced the argument lists by generic a b c d . > That would be different here?
I don't know. I have always used 1.x; I have zero experience with 2.x. Of course, I would prefer a solution that works with 1.x, too – but if the problem vanishes with 2.x, no such changes are necessary. > I'll take a look at what's happening here. Thanks! Werner