Am Sonntag, dem 27.06.2021 um 20:11 +0200 schrieb Knut Petersen: > Hi everybody! > > We have a stencil command 'char'. Normally grep is a good friend, but > grepping for 'char' gives a looong list of possible matches even if you > add some restrictions ;-)) > > So I decided to try a brutal search method and changed the current > definition of 'char' to > > (define (char font i) (ly:error (_ "Unsupported stencil command > 'char'"))) > > in scm/output-ps.scm. But 'make doc' succeeded. So it's clear that we > do not use the 'char' stencil command during the generation of all our > docs. Otoh we certainly do not exercise every possible code path during > 'make doc'. > > Is the char stencil really an unused artifact that might be removed or > did I overlook something?
I tried a bit of archeology and searching 'git log -p' for "char" (with quotation marks) leads to the following commits: https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/commit/c5d9ef8c7eaed663fabcd70742ba7a0e56cb337b https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/commit/e2c7a2ab964d7ab2b4d993634303327adf5e39f2 https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/commit/9505acaaf90190158f6b66b59da13db1454cddc4 So yes, probably unused. (FWIW, I didn't find any 'char in scm/) Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
