Am 01.10.2020 um 12:24 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
So I think it's more likely that the issue got exposed by
commit 5a957021a3 which runs lilypond once per document passed to
lilypond-book instead of per included file. This increases the chance
of being unlucky...
Another topic, but possibly related:
Could this potentially affect regtests, that
use (ly:set-option 'warning-as-error) or similar?
In the sense, that the state change triggered by ly:set-option leaks
through to other
snippets?

Btw., is it still good practise to use
the

(ly:set-option 'warning-as-error)
(ly:expect-warning ...)

construct in regtests? I vaguely remember a discussion about that some
time ago on -devel...)

Cheers,
Michael

Reply via email to