> On 26 Sep 2020, at 14:55, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> Despite Gould's “incorrect” verdict, here is an example from an old UE
> edition of Liszt's “Liebestraum No. 1”, which demonstrates that ties
> over clef changes *do* happen and make sense sometimes...
> 
> I still think that LilyPond should support that, handling the tie like
> a slur in this case.

A tie indicates that it is a note whose (time) value (normally) otherwise 
cannot be expressed in the notational system, thus having the same pitch, 
whereas a slur indicates an articulation of notes of different pitch, that they 
should be played together. What do you think it is in your example? :-)


Reply via email to