> On 26 Sep 2020, at 14:55, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Despite Gould's “incorrect” verdict, here is an example from an old UE > edition of Liszt's “Liebestraum No. 1”, which demonstrates that ties > over clef changes *do* happen and make sense sometimes... > > I still think that LilyPond should support that, handling the tie like > a slur in this case.
A tie indicates that it is a note whose (time) value (normally) otherwise cannot be expressed in the notational system, thus having the same pitch, whereas a slur indicates an articulation of notes of different pitch, that they should be played together. What do you think it is in your example? :-)