On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 11:42 PM Paolo Prete <paolopr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I could go on with many other details. > Which is of course my simple opinion; in any case I'm not asking to > implement anything. I'm just asking to add the excellent work done by the > author of the Font. A very meticulous work for which I thank him very much. > > This addition does not involve any development. All the stuff is already > developed. Just simply, AFAIK, add the fonts to their respective > directories, as I have already done.
Here are some things to consider: * You point to modern printers generating thinner lines. However, the design objective of Feta was to mimic plate engraving with thicker lines. In that sense it is working as intended, even if it is not your preferred style. (I do accept the blame for the font being a haphazard collection of individual glyphs I happened to like, rather than a coherent ensemble.) * LilyPond is built from source. Although rare, it does happen that we tweak glyphs (for example, see the work that Owen Taylor is doing for Smufl support). This process doesn't work well with Gonville, as it is not generated with Metafont. How do you envision development happening with Gonville as a standard font? > Hope this can help. I think the most practical solution is to wait for Smufl support for LilyPond, which should make it easier to use a wide array of music fonts. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
