Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> writes:
> Am Freitag, den 19.06.2020, 11:47 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:45 PM Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> wrote: >> > Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2020, 11:21 -0600 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >> > > is it the difference between an output .ps file and an output .eps file? >> > >> > No, broken.ps file is only the driver for Ghostscript: >> > mark /OutputFile (broken.pdf) (pdfwrite) finddevice putdeviceprops >> > setdevice (broken.eps) run >> > >> > Both ways use the same broken.eps file: >> > %!PS-Adobe-2.0 EPSF-2.0 >> > >> > Yes, it's empty except for that line. >> >> That doesn't look like an EPS file that LilyPond should be producing. >> >> Let me do some research today where that comes from. > > No, this is the only smallest possible EPS file that shows the problem. > I'm attaching the real file from LilyPond to this message, but the > important part is probably that it contains no graphical objects. That triggers some memory: this may not have anything to do with autorotation? That GhostScript decides on landscape orientation unexpectedly or so? -- David Kastrup
