Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2020, 19:03 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development: > I think the way forward for now is reverting above commit, even if I > don't really like it. Unless somebody has a really clever idea how to > 1) avoid GS producing a broken PDF (if that's the case), or > 2) make xelatex accept the PDF produced by GS as described above.
Here's a merge request that reverts the commit and the follow-up fixes: https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/176 To be clear: I'm not happy doing this, I very much liked Han-Wen's idea. But breaking the documentation build on a pretty standard configuration is not the outcome I had hoped for... Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
