Am Samstag, den 23.05.2020, 16:38 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska: > Am 23. Mai 2020 15:01:11 MESZ schrieb Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: > > > I can grant you access to the repository later today if needed. > > > However I'd first like to understand (probably from Werner) what > > > makes a branch in the upstream repository more "preserving" than a > > > public clone. Being distributed it really doesn't make much > > > difference from the git perspective. > > > > IMO, code for a LilyPond GSoC project should become an integral part > > of the master git repository. I think it should be freezed in its > > final form (this is, right after GSoC ends) for documentation > > purposes. If the stuff gets merged, the branch should still stay and > > not be deleted. > > > > Note that this is my personal point of view, and I don't insist on it. > > On the other hand: if you see problems with that approach please > > elaborate. > > I would second that a student who has been accepted to GSoC should be > considered part of the team and grantwd push access, as long as there are > regulations preventing them from accidentally pushing to master.
Invited @WolfGangsta to the lilypond group.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
