On May 9, 2020, at 15:13, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > >> ->CS At any rate, I think that we should have appropriate CG >> instructions at the time we make the switch. They don't have to be >> perfect (the CG has a much lower editing bar than the NR), but they >> need to be in place, IMO. > > It's sort of a hen and egg problem: if we want to have all that before, > it increases the workload for those preparing the migration and they > have to guess. > > I totally agree that the CG should reflect the new workflows. But at > the time we do the switch, those new workflows are still in flux.
I understand Carl's perspective, but I'm on the side of jumping in. I don't expect that we'll be inundated with newbie contributors between now and the time we figure out what to put in the CG. Maybe we could put in a minimal note referring to the project on GitLab and explaining that a more thorough CG revision is pending. — Dan
