https://codereview.appspot.com/573770043/diff/553990043/lily/stencil-integral.cc File lily/stencil-integral.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/573770043/diff/553990043/lily/stencil-integral.cc#newcode966 lily/stencil-integral.cc:966: copy.raise (y_pos[i] - my_y); hm, the old code passed different arguments in the two branches: copy.shift (x_pos[i] - my_x); vs. copy.shift (y_pos[i] - my_y); and copy.raise (y_pos[i] - my_y); vs. copy.raise (x_pos[i] - my_x); AFAICS this has nothing to do with commutativity of shift and raise. https://codereview.appspot.com/573770043/
