On 2020/04/18 10:32:50, lemzwerg wrote: > > I agree with the sentiment, but I fail to come up > > with a naming choice that does not make the cure > > worse than the problem. > > I would simply use GET_LISTENERX (or GET_LISTENER1) for the longer call.
That's being obtuse. Requires learning two things instead of one. https://codereview.appspot.com/549890043/
