Hi all, following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This should also avoid overlooking old changes that have not been merged yet. The following list is by no means complete, but maybe a good start:
dev/pango contains commits: 53ed2b55e2 Add a RAII wrapper for extracting FT_Face from PangoFcFont c93c477180 Make Pango >= 1.36 mandatory. in master: 9cf8d35e8c Add a RAII wrapper for extracting FT_Face from PangoFcFont 15b7118410 Make Pango >= 1.36 mandatory. I'm fairly certain the branch can be removed. Branches dev/issue3300, dev/issue3330, dev/issue3648 are likely related to the named issues which have status 'Verified'. AFAICS there are some additional commits in the branches, could be due to review comments? David, you are probably the best to judge if they are fully merged or some changes could still be relevant, could you take a look? As far as I understand, master now also has the relevant commits from dev/guile-v2-work, dev/guilev2, and dev/guilev21? Can those branches be dropped to avoid possible confusion about the current status? Then there are some dev/user/ branches. I consider these relatively "private" to that person and would not propose to delete them on a global basis. Still maybe everyone can take a look and delete unused personal branches on their own? Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
