On 2020/02/03 09:49:32, hanwenn wrote: > On 2020/02/02 15:28:44, dak wrote:
> > That's what I am trying right now, but you cannot quote outer functions as a > > value either (the problem is the value, not the innerness) so you need to do > it > > by name and I would like not to have to export it, so I try with (@@ > guile-user > > define-session-internal) but haven't found the right incantation yet. Still > > fiddling. If it cannot be avoided, it will end up as an exported > > define-session-internal . > > I don't get it. define-session is not a public macro either. No, I don't get it. Darn, you are right. So the cross-module issue does not exist and just using 'define-session-internal should be fine. > What is wrong with the code I propose in this change? You mean define-syntax? I'd like to avoid it for now since people have no way of getting acquainted with it, and most new developers have never worked with Scheme before. > > > > What is the problem precisely with void ? I assume that is not about > > > define-session but for define-music-function, which looks like it has a very > > > complex macro expansion. > > > > > > Can you provide a repro scenario? > > > But basically the symptom was just that using define-syntax in a typical > manner > > from inside of a LilyPond document crashed with some error completely > unrelated > > to the actual input. > > would be good to have an actual patch along with the failing .ly to examine more > closely. I can try again but the only way in which it would be relevant is if we forked Guile-1.8.8 and started fixing bugs in it. I've reported it already but it has been declared as wontfix. The report is <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17096> https://codereview.appspot.com/553480044/
