On 2020/01/29 03:08:48, Dan Eble wrote: > change the test, not the display function
Oh, I am sorry to have been misleading with my comment: I think your original patch was the right thing to do. I just remarked that what display-lily printed would have also worked as input so this was not really bug rather than an uglier alternative. But your change of its output clearly was one for the better, even if the previous output was only uglier than your fix, not strictly wrong. I should learn to better keep my inclination to lecture in check when there is nothing to be fixed. https://codereview.appspot.com/563430046/
