On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:58 AM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> I guess I am a developer with repository access, but in Salzburg, > >> Werner > >> offered to me to do the mechanics of shepherding the patches through, > >> and > >> I'd like to take that offer. My time is probably better spent > >> navigating > >> the arcana of the GUILE 2 / 3 transition. > >> > > > > OK, that looks reasonable. That means patches will *not* get pushed > > "without any of your involvement" but you have to ask someone, i.e. > > Werner to do so. Probably he's monitoring this anyway, but you might > > ping him again privately, just in case. > > I can also do this. The decision should still be done individually: > some patches reach "push" in spite of comments on Rietveld, and James > implements more of a janitorial process and the decision which comments > may be showstoppers really rests with the patch submitter.
Thanks, that's greatly appreciated. BTW, Do issues get closed on Rietveld automatically too? I still have many open reviews from many years ago. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
