> On 19 Jan 2020, at 08:41, Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:21 AM Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> As it stands, GitLab would probably be a more viable candidate to >>> look at than GitHub. >> >> I agree. IMHO, the main repository should stay at Savannah, though. > > I strongly disagree with this.
I do too. > If we are serious about code review (and it seems that we are), the > code review has to be integrated with the git hosting system. With the > current setup, there needs to be infrastructure that takes a patch for > review, applies it to source tree, runs tests, and then reports back. > On submission, something has to apply the patch, and push the result > to the git master branch. Yes! E > I don't how this done today with LilyPond (manually?). Doing this > manually is tedious and error-prone busywork. If it is automated, it > requires infrastructure that needs maintenance, and we have too few > developers anyway. > > Also, in practice, if you visit the lilypond website, or its savannah > page, one cannot find the in-progress patches that others are working > on and you cannot find its bug reports. By contrast, with Gerrit or > Github, you could go to > > https://review.gerrithub.io/q/project:lilypond%252Flilypond+status:open > > or > > https://github.com/lilypond/lilypond/pulls > > and see what is happening with the project. > > -- > Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen >
