> On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:35, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond > development <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> wrote: > > By far no Mac expert, but if dynamic libraries are problematic would it > help to have a static executable? I experimented with such a setup for > Linux, and I eventually got it to build. Not sure what the status of my > script is, I can try to dig it up…
Dynamic libraries have long been the default on MacOS, but the paths are hardcoded into the binary. So I figure an app needs relative paths to its resources.
